<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indians Need Better Reasons for Ignoring Manny Ramirez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wahoosonfirst.com/2012/01/16/indians-need-better-reasons-for-ignoring-manny-ramirez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wahoosonfirst.com/2012/01/16/indians-need-better-reasons-for-ignoring-manny-ramirez/</link>
	<description>A Cleveland Indians Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:22:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Didn&#039;t the Indians Sign Manny Ramirez? — Wahoo&#039;s on First</title>
		<link>http://wahoosonfirst.com/2012/01/16/indians-need-better-reasons-for-ignoring-manny-ramirez/#comment-6186</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Didn&#039;t the Indians Sign Manny Ramirez? — Wahoo&#039;s on First</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wahoosonfirst.com/?p=2974#comment-6186</guid>
		<description>[...] that there was much of a chance that he was coming to Cleveland to begin with. GM Chris Antonetti had made it clear that he wasn&#8217;t interested in bringing Ramirez back to the organization he debuted with. But [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that there was much of a chance that he was coming to Cleveland to begin with. GM Chris Antonetti had made it clear that he wasn&#8217;t interested in bringing Ramirez back to the organization he debuted with. But [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Would A.J. Burnett Trade Make Any Sense for Indians?— Wahoo&#039;s on First</title>
		<link>http://wahoosonfirst.com/2012/01/16/indians-need-better-reasons-for-ignoring-manny-ramirez/#comment-3089</link>
		<dc:creator>Would A.J. Burnett Trade Make Any Sense for Indians?— Wahoo&#039;s on First</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wahoosonfirst.com/?p=2974#comment-3089</guid>
		<description>[...] the fact that Pronk will inevitably miss at least 50 games, that&#8217;s why the Tribe&#8217;s refusal to consider signing Manny Ramirez is so puzzling). So Hafner is more valuable to Cleveland than Burnett would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the fact that Pronk will inevitably miss at least 50 games, that&#8217;s why the Tribe&#8217;s refusal to consider signing Manny Ramirez is so puzzling). So Hafner is more valuable to Cleveland than Burnett would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indians Need Better Reasons for Ignoring Manny Ramirez - BallHyped, MLB &#124; BallHyped Sports Blogs</title>
		<link>http://wahoosonfirst.com/2012/01/16/indians-need-better-reasons-for-ignoring-manny-ramirez/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>Indians Need Better Reasons for Ignoring Manny Ramirez - BallHyped, MLB &#124; BallHyped Sports Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wahoosonfirst.com/?p=2974#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>[...] Home &#8250; MLB &#8250; Indians Need Better Reasons for Ignoring Manny Ramirez     [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Home &rsaquo; MLB &rsaquo; Indians Need Better Reasons for Ignoring Manny Ramirez     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 25/29 queries in 0.077 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 300/330 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: wahoosonfirst.com @ 2013-05-20 09:43:58 by W3 Total Cache -->