Oct 2, 2012; Cleveland, OH, USA; Cleveland Indians designated hitter Travis Hafner (48) hits a two-run home run in the ninth inning against the Chicago White Sox at Progressive Field. Mandatory Credit: David Richard-USA TODAY Sports

Indians Strike Out by Not Signing Travis Hafner

Perhaps the biggest remaining Indians storyline of the offseason effectively came to an end Thursday as former Cleveland designated hitter agreed to a one-year deal with the New York Yankees. The deal reportedly guarantees Hafner $2 million for 2013 and will include performance incentives.

The Indians had never publicly ruled out bringing Hafner back; as recently as last week they were said to be considering signing him and Jim Thome to fill the vacancy at DH. But now that Pronk’s market price has been revealed, we can infer that the Tribe was never really serious about re-signing him after all—and that sure seems like a mistake.

Let’s get this out of the way: say what you want about Travis Hafner, but he can still hit. Since 2009 he’s OPSed over or just below .800 every season, with OPS+’s ranging from 120 to 130. He’s averaged 24 homers and 83 RBI per 162 games over that span. These aren’t the kinds of gaudy power numbers he posted in his prime, but with the exception of Nick Swisher that’s better than any other Cleveland player can be relied on to hit in 2013.

The predominant opinion among Tribe fans seems to be that the Indians would be better off using the DH slot to rotate bench players in and give the rest of the regulars some occasional rest, and that the roster spot that would have been Hafner’s would be better used on a utility man who can provide late-game versatility. These are noble sentiments and I’m all for questioning the utility of orthodox roster construction, but there’s a problem that makes this path unwise: the rest of the roster.

Consider who the Indians will be pencilling into the lineup this year in Hafner’s stead, either as the actual DH or to let a starter rest his glove for a game. The most likely candidates to pick up at-bats are Mike Aviles and Yan Gomes; they both had OBPs under .300 last year. Lou Marson could see expanded playing time to let Carlos Santana rest his knees—he hasn’t even slugged .300 since 2009. The organization seems to have given up on Matt LaPorta, neither Tim Fedroff nor Mike McDade has ever played in the majors, and Chris McGuiness has yet to even reach Triple-A. It’s entirely possible that one or more of them will prove a capable hitter, but would you bet on it? And is extra versatility really the priority when, in Aviles and Gomes, the team can field a respectable backup at almost every position with just two players?

None of this is new—that’s why I had been in favor of signing Hafner. The difference now is that we know Hafner’s price. Assuming he wasn’t averse to returning to Cleveland, the Indians probably could have matched the $2 million he’s getting from the Yankees and signed him. And if that’s the case, I have no idea why they didn’t do it in a heartbeat.

Jesse Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

I understand payroll space is tight for a small-market team, but it’s hard to imagine that being much of an obstacle. Last month, the Indians spent $7 million on Brett Myers, an average-at-best pitcher, even though they already had a full rotation. Last year, they spent $3 million on a below-replacement-level Casey Kotchman. Also in 2012, they reupped an injured Grady Sizemore for $5 million—the parallel here is actually quite strong, except Hafner is a better player at this point and Cleveland gave Sizemore more than twice what they declined to offer Pronk. If money is that tight, why give Myers $7 million?

This has been a phenomenal offseason for the Indians. I’ve been fully supportive of almost everything they’ve done this winter and I truly admire the work Chris Antonetti & Co. have done in accumulating talent for 2013 while continuing to build for the future. But I can’t see the rationale in declining to cheaply fill the biggest hole on the roster. Maybe this isn’t a swing and miss, but letting Pronk leave seems like a pretty big called strike.

Should the Indians have re-signed Travis Hafner?

  • Yes (41%, 128 Votes)
  • No, they should sign another DH (32%, 98 Votes)
  • No, they should find a DH internally (27%, 84 Votes)

Total Voters: 310

Loading ... Loading ...

Next Indians Game View full schedule »
Tuesday, Sep 22 Sep7:05Detroit TigersBuy Tickets

Tags: Cleveland Indians New York Yankees Travis Hafner

  • aaronasbury

    This article assumes that Hafner would have wanted to re-sign with the Indians. I think the Yankees got a great deal for Hafner that the Indians should have matched, but if I was Hafner I would probably like to go to a contender before my career is over on a team where I don’t have to be relied on so much.

  • tribescribe

    “He’s averaged 24 homers and 83 RBI over that span.” Is that per 162 games played, because since 2009, Hafner has failed to top either number in a season, much less average them.

  • gareth

    Hafner and the indians both needed to move on. Travis gets a fresh start with a different organization and the indians get to give their young guys a look. Hafner is 34 and is not the future for this team so why retain him?
    Sure he can still hit when healthy but as a fan It has been sad seeing former tribe favorites like grady and travis struggle with injuries and look like shells of their former selves when they make sporadic appearances in the lineup (or in grady’s case, just disappear).
    A point could be made that the dissapointment and uncertainty eminating from these players could have had a negative effect on the team and organization as a whole. It couldn’t have been an uplifting experience for our players, coaches and front office seeing two “what might have beens” walking around the clubhouse earning millions of dollars while inactive.
    I’m not blaming grady and travis in any way for being injured. Injuries strike the best of them. Both guys were exceptionally hard workers and apparently great teammates. That 2007 lineup was a favorite of mine and I’ll always have a soft spot for cc, pronk, victor, grady and Casey Blake.
    I just hope kipnis, santana, chisehall. Brantley, bauer and carrasco can take the tribe to the next level like those other guys did.

  • gareth

    saying all that it is imperative that the tribe finds someone either internally or externally to fill the offensive void. the nice thing is the indians are not limited to which type of hitter or a specific position in their search.

  • disqus_GSNR4VRgAv

    Hafner was awful. Obviously PEDs got the best of him and once MLB started testing Hafner shrunk, not only in size but numbers and injuries got him every year. Good riddens to him. 2007 was his last good year although his average dropped

  • Jim Harper

    Cleveland’s loss is Yankees gain!

  • Myyear

    Thats 4 years ago. Past his prime and can;t stay healthy.

  • Pingback: Clevelinks, February 4: Pronk Fallout and Canzler DFAed Again - Wahoo's on First - A Cleveland Indians Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More